Why is the LPGA on a tourist course?
Ko'Olina is a beautiful golf course. Its grooming is immaculate. It has pretty water features. The service is what you'd expect from a nice resort. It smells good. It's in Hawaii. All reasons tourists and casual golfers - myself included - enjoy playing there. But I just don't get why the LPGA would select it for a tournament.
It's flat. It's wide open. The greens are almost as friendly as the service. A championship golf course? I think they're getting fast and loose with that classification, informal though it may be. Professional golfers should mop up that course like janitors on speed, and many of them did, especially Paula Creamer, who won the Fields Open this weekend (a three day event) at 16 under.
The women played from 6,519 yards. That's behind the "regular" tees (6,450), which have a course rating of 70.5 for men. The "championship" tees play to a maximum 6,867 yards and are rated 72.3 for men. For those of you who don't know, that is the number of strokes it should take a scratch golfer to complete the course. It's usually a couple strokes higher for women's ratings. So if we take the "regular" tees rating, add 2 for the gender difference and, oh, let's say .2 for the extra yardage, that's a rating of 72.7.* Par is 72. In the Fields Open, you have to go down to 58th place to see a golfer shoot even par. And I'd guess some of those women would actually be playing off a single digit handicap if they weren't pros. That's a lot of numbers and even a little math (I think I violated a restraining order there and probably argued against my point) but my point is, the course is too easy for pros.
*One little twist that could explain some of the higher numbers at the bottom of the pack is that these ratings are for scratch players, not pros. This makes a difference because they hit it farther and that can either eliminate or bring into play obstacles that were rated differently for the scratch player.
You won't catch the men playing a course like that. Heck, even from its maximum 6,867 yards, Tiger could probably go 'round it in 53 strokes. And just to throw a few more numbers while I'm feeling frisky, I'll conservatively estimate that Tiger would play to a +10. The USGA doesn't calculate handicaps to that level, but at their max of 3.5, they add another .5 for the 135 slope rating. So, 72.3 - 10.5 = 61.8. Yikes.
A little real-life perspective: I played Ko'Olina when I was a fresh beginner of 6 months with a 28.8 index. I played from the forward tees (71.8/126) which gave me a course handicap of 32, so my target score to play exactly to it was 104. I played it twice the same day and shot 100, then 95 (-4 and -9 net). Yes, I posted them both! From an article by Ross Goodner (Golf Digest) I found on the Pope of Slope:
The average golfer beats his handicap by only 2.7 strokes as his BEST score in 20 rounds. Fewer than nine percent of golfers ever beat their handicap by six strokes, and only two percent have ever beat it by nine strokes.
So I had two improbable rounds because of my stellar concentration (check it out - that's just a practice swing!) or this course needs to be re-rated. And the pros need to leave it to the amateurs. And I need to play like I did when I was a beginner, but that's another story.
I still love the ladybug!


















